Studie untersucht auf Basis von Daten des Nationalen Bildungspanels Entwicklung der Schulnoten nach elterlichem Bildungshintergrund – Nach dem Wechsel auf das Gymnasium lassen gerade die Leistungen anfänglich guter SchülerInnen aus Elternhäusern mit niedrigem Bildungsniveau deutlich nach
Kinder, die auf ein Gymnasium gehen und Eltern mit einem niedrigen Bildungsniveau haben, fallen im Laufe ihrer Schulzeit im Vergleich zu anderen SchülerInnen leistungsmäßig zurück. Das gilt insbesondere dann, wenn sie zu Beginn der Gymnasialschulzeit in der fünften Klasse in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik noch EinserschülerInnen waren. Das geht aus einer Studie des Deutschen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin) hervor, für die der Bildungsökonom Felix Weinhardt gemeinsam mit Sophie Horneber Daten des Nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS) ausgewertet hat. Als eine der ersten nimmt die Studie dabei die komplette Pflichtschulzeit von der ersten bis zur neunten Klasse unter die Lupe. „Die Ergebnisse zeigen, wie wichtig der Bildungshintergrund der Eltern für die Schulnoten ihrer Kinder noch immer ist“, erklärt Weinhardt. „Offenbar hängt nicht nur die Frage, ob man überhaupt auf ein Gymnasium geht, davon ab, sondern auch die Entwicklung der Noten im weiteren Verlauf der Schulzeit.“
Herr Weinhardt, Sie haben die intergenerationale Bildungsungleichheit in Deutschland untersucht. Wie sind Sie dabei vorgegangen?
Wir haben uns angesehen, welche Noten Kinder aus Elternhäusern mit verschiedenen Bildungsniveaus im Schulverlauf erreichen. Die Frage ist, inwieweit sich Bildungskarrieren sozusagen vererben, also inwieweit Kinder ähnliche Bildungskarrieren haben wie ihre Eltern. Dieser Zusammenhang ist in Deutschland in besonderem Maße ausgeprägt. In diesem Bericht untersuchen wir alle Schulklassen von der ersten Klasse in der Grundschule bis zur neunten Klasse, also dem letzten Schuljahr der Pflichtschulzeit. [...]
Das Interview mit Felix Weinhardt wurde im Wochenbericht 23/2018 veröffentlicht. Hier gibt es das Interview als PDF-Dokument und als Podcast.
Die Riester-Rente wird bald volljährig, sie kommt damit in ein Alter, das allgemeinhin mit Reife und Aufbruch zu Neuem verbunden wird. Seit 2001 soll sie als eine individuelle, freiwillige, kapitalgedeckte, steuerlich geförderte Altersvorsorge künftige Versorgungslücken in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung ausgleichen, die durch die Absenkung des Rentenniveaus entstehen. Den Zuschlag für den Vertrieb bekam damals die Versicherungs- und Finanzwirtschaft. Schätzungen zufolge sollten etwa 35 Millionen Menschen die Förderung in Anspruch nehmen. Das Produkt sollte für Geringverdienende erschwinglich sein, weitere Zielgruppen waren Frauen und Alleinstehende. Soweit – so gut?
Der vollständige Kommentar von Kornelia Hagen aus dem DIW Wochenbericht 23/2018
IPI’s Youssef Mahmoud spoke at a high level seminar on sustaining peace with particular focus on African women mediators. The event was convened by the African Union Commission, Belgium, and the International Peace Institute on April 25, 2018.
Reflecting on mediation processes through a sustaining peace lens, Mr. Mahmoud questioned the assumptions informing the current “mediation paradigm,” in light of the changes in the nature of contemporary conflict. Helping conflict parties move from violence to politics through mediation should not be equated with peace. Ending war and building peace, while interconnected, are separate processes.
Women mediators at the grassroots level are the “custodians of peace, even amidst devastation” he observed. They should not be invited to participate in peace processes, just to be consulted or represent women’s issues only. “If they are good enough to be at the table, why can’t they participate in designing it?”
Mr. Mahmoud added that while training may be necessary, it should be driven by the humility to recognize that women mediators are not blank pages. “They have capacities, not just needs.” Building on what they know and what they have “will unleash their leadership potential to sustain peace.”
jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("#isloaderfor-wfsevr").fadeOut(2000, function () { jQuery(".pagwrap-wfsevr").fadeIn(1000);});});
The 48th annual Vienna Seminar took place on June 5, 2018, with the focus, “European Contributions to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward.” In the face of ongoing geopolitical shifts and national political pressures, the seminar examined the prospects of sustainable European participation in current and future UN peace operations as well as the operations’ effectiveness.
Co-sponsored by IPI, the Austrian Federal Ministry for Europe Integration of Foreign Affairs, and the Federal Ministry of Defence, the seminar presented different perspectives on European participation in UN peacekeeping operations. Participants included experts from IPI, the European External Action Service, the European Council on Foreign Relations, the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Vrije Universiteit in Brussels, as well as government officials from the European Union, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Austria, Ireland, and France, along with leaders from UN peacekeeping missions and the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations.
In session one on strategic context for UN peacekeeping, speakers noted that recent European engagement in peacekeeping missions—outside of longstanding contributions to missions like UNIFIL—has been driven by specific crises, and influenced by concerns regarding counterterrorism, migration flows, and humanitarian issues. They agreed that European countries have provided niche capabilities to specific missions, and there is currently little appetite to expand to other operations.
Participants noted that Europe is experiencing a rise in “Euro-isolationism.” Some countries, like the UK and France, have reaffirmed their commitment to collective security, but many European countries are increasingly focused on territorial defense. These trends take place amid a seeming retreat from multilateralism.
Session two offered space for diverse perspectives on European participation in UN peacekeeping operations. A key discussion point was that European Troop Contributing Countries (TCCs) generally bring both the capacity and willingness to project and use force, a high level of professionalism and standards of training and preparedness, as well as, of equipment and niche capabilities that may otherwise be in short supply. While these traits are not unique to European troop contributing countries, they are generally shared by European peacekeepers.
Session three addressed the challenges of contemporary UN peacekeeping. The UN has adapted to European expectations regarding intelligence and medical capacity based on their experience with NATO, participants stated. But European countries have also adjusted to UN operations. While operational challenges and gaps still remain, including in areas of logistics, enablers, alignment of responsibility with authority, and security in hostile environments, there has been significant innovation in technology that aids peacekeeping missions, measurement of performance, and efforts to improve medical response.
In the final session, speakers discussed ways to move forward in sustaining European involvement in UN peacekeeping. European contributions to UN peacekeepers do appear sustainable in the near future, they said, but may be influenced by national political considerations, including the tensions emerging between internationalists and more-populist political constituencies. In this light, communicating success is important—less to incentivize participation than to prevent diminishment.
Recent European contributions embody innovative approaches to supporting UN peacekeeping. From employing multinational rotations to engaging through bilateral, trilateral and regional mechanisms, European countries successfully mobilize diverse capabilities to help the UN address clear needs. However, sustainable and comprehensive European engagement must move beyond short-term deployments of specialized troops and capabilities. Although Europe’s interests in UN peacekeeping will be driven largely by those crises that impact its security, European countries can nonetheless offer even more to the UN.
Europe can channel sustained diplomatic and financial support to political processes in host countries and to negotiations over peacekeeping budgets and UN reforms. Ensuring troops from across the continent are trained on UN peacekeeping standards and guidelines can greatly improve interoperability and cohesion in the field. Recognizing the added value of EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) deployments, partnerships and tailored configurations will be increasingly important for mobilizing European commitment to the values and practice of collective security.
The event was held in the Austrian National Defence Academy. Lieutenant-General Karl Schmidseder, the Director General of Operations at the Austrian Federal Ministry for Defence, gave welcoming remarks, and IPI Vice President Adam Lupel introduced the event.
Other participants included:
Libya’s overarching statelessness, and the violence and lawlessness that result, permeate the country, which is plagued by local-level conflicts. However, local mediation efforts have flourished over the last few years. As a senior UN official noted, “Local mediation is the best thing that has happened in Libya since the revolution.”
This report examines these local mediation processes to explore the significance of their impact. It focuses on the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) and the support it provides internal efforts in Libya to solve local conflicts or the mediation of such disputes. It also describes and analyzes how Libyans themselves are able to address and resolve local conflicts, or at least contain their escalation.
The report offers a number of lessons based on the challenges UNSMIL has faced in supporting local mediation efforts in Libya. These include the importance of leveraging soft power, taking a coordinated and long-term approach, linking the local and national levels, ensuring sovereignty and local ownership, intervening through local mediators, and expanding beyond traditional political actors.
Der Gastbeitrag von Jürgen Schupp ist am 3. Juni 2018 im Forum der Süddeutschen Zeitung erschienen.
Ein sozialer Arbeitsmarkt, auf dem Mindestlohn gezahlt wird, könnte Hartz-IV-Beziehern aus der Grundsicherung heraushelfen
An diesem Montag findet im Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales des Deutschen Bundestags eine öffentliche Anhörung zu Hartz IV und insbesondere zur Sanktionspraxis statt. Die Neuordnung des Sozialsystems wird 17 Jahre alt, und man muss festhalten: Im Zweiklang Fördern und Fordern, der Pate der neuen Architektur war, hat das Fordern die Oberhand gewonnen, während das Fördern zunehmend kleingeschrieben wird. Die angestrebte Symmetrie zwischen Rechten ("Ich habe ein Recht darauf, in einer schwierigen Phase meines Lebens finanziell und bei der Aufnahme einer Erwerbstätigkeit unterstützt zu werden") und Pflichten ("Ich muss alle Möglichkeiten zur Beendigung oder Verringerung der Hilfebedürftigkeit ausschöpfen, um dem Steuerzahler nur so lange wie wirklich nötig auf der Tasche zu liegen") ist seit geraumer Zeit aus der Balance geraten. Die hohe Zahl der jährlich verhängten Sanktionen ist ein Beleg dafür.
Sanktionen werden im gegenwärtigen Grundsicherungssystem bei Pflichtverletzungen verhängt, und zwar in Form von Leistungskürzungen. Wie bereits vor drei Jahren bei einer ähnlichen Veranstaltung dürfte auch am Montag im Bundestag die Sinnhaftigkeit der Strafmaßnahmen infrage gestellt werden. Gerade die negativen Folgen drastischer Strafen gegenüber jungen Menschen dürften thematisiert werden. Auch eine viel grundsätzlichere Frage steht auf der Tagesordnung, nämlich, ob man von einem Existenzminimum überhaupt etwas kürzen darf. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht überprüft die Mechanismen ebenfalls.
Es gibt zahlreiche Studien zu den Auswirkungen von Sanktionen, aber keine beantwortet zuverlässig die Frage, ob diese wirklich einen Beitrag zu einer nachhaltigen Eingliederung in den Arbeitsmarkt leisten. Hinzu kommen weitere Fragen zu den sozialen, gesundheitlichen sowie psychosozialen Nebeneffekten der Sanktionspraxis, von der Angst bislang nicht Sanktionierter ganz zu schweigen.
Im vergangenen Jahr wurden rund 950 000 Sanktionen verhängt. In 639 000Fällen wurde dagegen Widerspruch eingelegt, dem in rund einem Drittel der Fälle stattgegeben wurde. Die Bundesregierung gibt zu, keine Erkenntnisse darüber zu haben, wie viel Personal- und Sachkosten durch die Klage- und Widerspruchsbearbeitungen jährlich entstehen.
Belegt ist allerdings, dass Sanktionen tatsächlich dazu führen, dass mehr Menschen eine Beschäftigung aufnehmen. Ob dies auch nachhaltig zu einer besseren beruflichen Integration führt als sanktionsfreie Förderung, wissen wir nicht. Fast zwei Drittel der Mittel der Bundesagentur für Arbeit fließen in die Verwaltung und lediglich 38 Prozent in die Vermittlung von Arbeit, auch dies ist ein Beleg dafür, dass die Balance nicht mehr stimmt.
Vier Milliarden Euro sollen jenen zugutekommen, die seit sechs Jahren arbeitslos sind
Zwar ist nicht zu erwarten, dass die Sanktionspraxis in dieser Legislaturperiode grundsätzlich infrage gestellt oder gar abgeschafft wird, aber es wäre für künftige Diskussionen viel gewonnen, wenn die Öffentlichkeit besser und umfassender über Wirkungen, Kosten und Nutzen von Sanktionen informiert würde. Modellprojekte sowohl mit einer milderen Sanktionspraxis als auch mit einer befristeten Aussetzung der Strafen könnten hierzu wertvolle Erkenntnisse liefern.
Nicht nur beim Fordern muss sich etwas ändern, auch die Mechanismen des Förderns müssen weiterentwickelt werden. Arbeits- und Sozialminister Hubertus Heil will im Sommer eine Reform der Grundsicherung für Arbeitssuchende vorlegen. Ziel ist es, den Hartz-IV-Bezieherinnen und -Beziehern ein sozialversicherungspflichtiges Beschäftigungsverhältnis mit langfristiger Perspektive anzubieten - anstelle von "kurzatmigen Maßnahmen, die nichts bringen". Vier Milliarden Euro zusätzliche Mittel sollen denjenigen zugutekommen, die bereits mindestens sechs Jahre arbeitslos sind, in Form von rund 150 000 Stellen auf einem neuen sozialen Arbeitsmarkt. Gerade Langzeitarbeitslose stehen oft vor großen Hemmnissen, was die Aufnahme einer beruflichen Tätigkeit angeht, und brauchen dabei ein gezieltes Coaching.
Warum aber warten, bis jemand sechs Jahre ohne Arbeit gewesen ist, bevor er oder sie Anspruch auf eine solche Stelle hat? Es wird argumentiert, dass das Angebot sich in erster Linie an diejenigen richten soll, die auf dem regulären, dem sogenannten ersten Arbeitsmarkt, praktisch nicht mehr zu vermitteln sind. Das mag plausibel sein, aber auch oder gerade "frische" Langzeitarbeitslose - Menschen, die seit maximal zwei Jahren ohne Job sind - sollten die Chance bekommen, rasch aus dem Leistungsbezug herauszukommen, der sich für die Betroffenen allzu oft zur Dauerschleife entwickelt.
Ein Modell für solche Passiv-Aktiv-Transfers, die es Menschen erlauben, nicht mehr nur passiv Leistungen zu empfangen, sondern für eine Tätigkeit entlohnt zu werden, hat der Berliner Bürgermeister Michael Müller vorgeschlagen. Ähnliche Modellprojekte haben in einigen Bundesländern bereits durchaus Erfolge gezeigt. Wird Mindestlohn gezahlt und wird die Tätigkeit in Vollzeit ausgeübt - ganz anders als bei den bestehenden Ein-Euro-Jobs -, gelingt es in der Regel den Betroffenen, aus dem System der Grundsicherung herauszukommen.
Wenn aber dieser soziale Arbeitsmarkt erst nach mehreren Jahren zugänglich ist, sollten die Erwartungen der großen Koalition an die gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz der Reform nicht zu hoch sein. Dies gilt insbesondere dann, wenn ein solches Angebot ausschließlich freiwillige Teilnahme voraussetzt, aber auch dann, wenn die Nicht-teilnahme sanktioniert wird.
Die Inanspruchnahme dieses neuen Instruments sollte nicht nur ausschließlich auf freiwilliger Basis erfolgen, sondern auch eine Selbstverpflichtung zur Weiterqualifizierung enthalten. So hätten die Betroffenen eine faire Chance, rasch in den ersten Arbeitsmarkt zu wechseln und auch nicht auf einer subventionierten Stelle mit Mindestlohn "kleben zu bleiben". Die bisherige Länge der Erwerbskarriere könnte - wollte man nicht allen Langzeitarbeitslosen ein Angebot unterbreiten - auch zu den Anspruchskriterien zählen: Das würde sicherlich das in den letzten Jahren verloren gegangene Empfinden sozialer Gerechtigkeit stärken, denn der abrupte Übergang in Hartz IV, egal wie lange man davor gearbeitet hat, wird als unfair empfunden.
Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft, Mindestlohn, Schulfächerpräferenzen von Mädchen und Jungen: Mit spannenden und vielfältigen Themen ist das Deutsche Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin) auch in diesem Jahr bei der Langen Nacht der Wissenschaften vertreten. In den Räumen der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft in der Chausseestraße 111 präsentiert das DIW Berlin am 9. Juni gemeinsam mit anderen Leibniz-Instituten seine Arbeit mit einem Informationsstand und insgesamt sechs Vorträgen.
Das DIW-Programm beginnt um 18 Uhr mit der Prognose des kommenden Fußball-Weltmeisters durch Gert G. Wagner, Senior Research Fellow am DIW Berlin, der für diesen Zweck ein Marktwertmodell entwickelt hat. In den weiteren Vorträgen spricht der Dekan des DIW-Doktorandenprogramms, Georg Weizsäcker, über seine „etwas andere Sicht auf Menschen, Märkte und Fehlerquellen“, gefolgt von DIW-Ökonom Martin Gornig, der die „neue Attraktivität“ Berlins aus wirtschaftlicher Sicht beleuchtet. SOEP-Forscherin Alexandra Fedorets erklärt die Vor- und Nachteile des Mindestlohns und Marius Clemens aus der Abteilung Konjunkturpolitik beantwortet die Frage, ob der deutschen Wirtschaft aufgrund des demografischen Wandels bald die Arbeitskräfte ausgehen werden. Zum Abschluss der Vortragsreihe geht Bildungsforscher Felix Weinhardt auf die Schulfächerpräferenzen von Jungen und Mädchen ein und beleuchtet die Konsequenzen.
Die Lange Nacht der Wissenschaften findet in diesem Jahr zum 18. Mal statt. An ihr nehmen rund 70 wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen aus Berlin und Potsdam teil, die am 9. Juni von 17 Uhr bis Mitternacht ihre Türen öffnen.
Fifteen years since the party’s ascendance in power, AK Parti enters for the first time an electoral race facing several important challenges. Despite the economic crisis and the government’s authoritarian policy, Erdoğan could still win the elections based on his advantages and the weaknesses of the opposition. In the early elections of 24th June, AK Parti could secure the continuation of its power, but in the second round of elections may create interesting balances in the new parliament.
Please find the Working Paper here.
The number of refugees arriving in Europe by sea has dropped dramatically. Between January and the end of May 2018, only 28,000 migrants and refugees arrived via the Mediterranean route. That’s a 53% drop compared to the same period in 2017, and an 85% drop compared to 2016 (when 193,000 people arrived).
Yet the fall in arrivals hasn’t made the politics any less divisive. Europe is still struggling over what to do with the people already here. Redistributing refugees remains a ferociously contentious issue (see, for example, the anti-refugee rhetoric in the recent Hungarian elections) and large numbers of people remain trapped in a legal limbo, many in reception centres in Greece and Italy waiting to be told they can move to other countries. Critics say EU plans to redistribute refugees have totally failed. Even if they had succeeded, many asylum seekers (including those from Afghanistan) were anyway excluded from the scheme.
Citizens in frontline countries, including Greece, feel they’ve been abandoned. Whilst Greece, for example, has received significant financial assistance to help cope with the refugee crisis, the country has been completely overwhelmed in terms of hosting and processing arrivals. Plus, the refugee and migrant crisis took place while Greece has been undergoing painful austerity measures, including mass redundancies and public sector cuts.
In order to take a closer look at the local impact of the refugee crisis, we have launched our ‘Cities & Refugees‘ project – aimed at fostering a Europe-wide dialogue between citizens, refugees and asylum seekers, NGOs, politicians, and European leaders. The emphasis is on connecting local, everyday life at the city level to decisions made in Brussels and national capitals.
Today, we are looking at Athens. Greece is one of the frontline countries in the European refugee and migrant crisis. The number of arrivals by sea has fallen since an EU-Turkey deal allowing Greece to return new “irregular migrants” to Turkey in exchange for pre-processed Syrian refugees. Still, in 2017 there were roughly 60,000 asylum seekers and migrants stranded in the country.
Greece has a population of roughly 11 million (though it has been declining in recent years), with around 3-4 million living in the “Athens Urban Area” (i.e. the city of Athens itself, plus the greater metropolitan area surrounding it). It’s estimated that more than 2,500 refugees and migrants are living in squats in Athens occupied by anarchists and so-called “solidarity” groups. Conditions for asylum seekers and migrants in Greece have been heavily criticised by NGOs.
Yet, according to Eurostat, more than one in three Greeks in 2016 were experiencing conditions of poverty or social exclusion, including 37.8% of children under the age of 17 (the highest percentage in the EU since 2010). In recent months, there have been protests from both asylum seekers and Greek residents who feel like they’ve been abandoned.
Read the interview with Dr. Angeliki Dimitriadi here.
Post-Doctoral Position in Energy Market Modeling
Die Abteilung Energie, Verkehr, Umwelt sucht eine/n wissenschaftliche/n MitarbeiterIn mit hohem Interesse an Energiewirtschaft und Modellierung des Energiemarkts.
Alle Informationen finden Sie in der Stellenanzeige.
Studentische Hilftkräfte
Außerdem werden derzeit studentische Hilfskräfte zur Mitarbeit in diversen Forschungsprojekten gesucht.
Bewerbungsschluss ist der 11. Juni 2018. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.
On Tuesday, June 5th, IPI is hosting a Distinguished Author Series event featuring Elizabeth C. Economy, author of The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State. The conversation will be moderated by IPI Senior Adviser for External Relations Warren Hoge.
Remarks will begin at 6:20pm EST*
In The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State, eminent China scholar Elizabeth C. Economy provides an incisive look at the world’s most populous country. Inheriting a China burdened with slowing economic growth, rampant corruption, choking pollution, and a failing social welfare system, President Xi has reversed course, rejecting the liberalizing reforms of his predecessors. At home, Xi has centralized power in his own person, and the Chinese leadership has reasserted the role of the state in society and enhanced party control. Beyond its borders, Beijing has recast itself as a great power and has maneuvered itself to be an arbiter—not just a player—on the world stage. The Third Revolution argues that Xi’s dual reform trajectories—a more authoritarian system at home and a more ambitious foreign policy abroad—provide Beijing with new levers of influence that the West must learn to exploit to protect its own interests. Commenting on the book, Ian Bremmer, President of the Eurasia Group, said, “For the first time in modern history, we have a communist country poised to be the biggest and most important driver of the global free market. That’s astonishing. And we still don’t know what makes China’s political leadership—and Xi Jinping in particular—tick. If that freaks you out (and it should) Liz Economy’s book is the place to start.”
IPI’s Distinguished Author Series brings critically acclaimed writers to IPI to present on international issues and to engage in a lively discussion with experts from permanent missions to the UN and other members of the foreign affairs community in New York.
*If you are not logged into Facebook, times are shown in PST.
Three years after the signing of the 2015 Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali, many key provisions remain unimplemented. Threats posed by violent extremists and intercommunal violence exacerbate an already tense political environment, impeding the political process and the restoration and extension of state authority. These violent dynamics have claimed the lives of civilians, Malian security forces, MINUSMA peacekeepers, and French forces. Instability threatens to undermine the free and fair presidential elections scheduled for July as well as regional and municipal elections that are expected to take place later in the year.
In this context, the International Peace Institute (IPI), the Stimson Center, and Security Council Report organized a workshop on May 8, 2018, to discuss MINUSMA’s mandate and political strategy. This workshop offered a platform for member states and UN actors to develop a shared understanding and common strategic assessment of the situation in Mali. The discussion was intended to help the Security Council make informed decisions with respect to the strategic orientation, prioritization, and sequencing of the mission’s mandate and actions on the ground.
With a focus on providing support to the political process, the extension of state authority, security sector reform, and to other security actors, participants discussed how the Council could reflect these strategic priorities in the upcoming MINUSMA mandate. Several participants also highlighted potential tensions among mandated tasks, noting the need to consider more closely how each fits into the mission’s political strategy in order to achieve the Council’s strategic objectives.
jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("#isloaderfor-xetkwn").fadeOut(2000, function () { jQuery(".pagwrap-xetkwn").fadeIn(1000);});});
Members of different communities, ethnic groups, faiths and nationalities gathered around a Ramadan meal in solidarity with an interreligious group of people who were fasting to cement commitments to peace, tolerance and respect within faiths in Manama, May 30, 2018 at the International Peace Institute, Middle East & North Africa, (IPI MENA).
Marking the middle of the holy month of Ramadan with an Iftar, or fast breaking meal, hundreds of people from different religious and nationality affiliations gathered in a church, for an “Iftar for Peace.” The initiative was hosted by Al Bayareq Al Baydhaa, (The White Flags,) in cooperation with the Labour Market Regulatory Authority (LMRA), and IPI MENA.
The event was attended by ambassadors, government officials, dignitaries and religious leaders who served food and beverages to interreligious guests at the National Evangelical Church in a united call for interfaith peace.
In a statement to the media, Ausamah Al Absi, Head of LMRA, stressed the need for peaceful coexistence between faiths and cultures to ensure that “civil societies, international bodies, and government bodies can come together” to harmonize principles of tolerance and respect.
Reverend Hani Aziz, Pastor of the National Evangelical Church and Head of the Bahrain Society for Tolerance and Interfaith Coexistence, reinforced this view in his statement, stressing the diverse communities obligation is to incorporate and integrate all layers of society in order to create a culture of acceptance and therefore peace.
Noting the very diverse interfaith attendees, Nejib Friji, Director, IPI MENA, stated their contribution to the Iftar for Peace was a testament of their commitment, as well as “the Kingdom of Bahrain, IPI and all other nations represented by their ambassadors, towards the need to further reinforce the culture of peace and Interfaith Dialogue that is deeply enshrined in all beliefs and faiths.” He hailed the interfaith unity illustrated by the ambassadors and officials serving those who had been fasting this important meal. He said the event “carries more than one message.” Friji called on the “regional and multilateral system to stand together to serve all causes of peace through a united interfaith dialogue.”
On Tuesday, June 5th, IPI is hosting the live broadcast of the opening remarks and first session panel of it’s 48th Annual Vienna Seminar entitled “European Contributions to UN Peacekeeping Operations: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward.”
Remarks will begin at 9:00am CET.
The 2018 Vienna Seminar will focus on lessons from recent European engagement in United Nations peace operations. The aim of this year’s seminar is to examine the prospects of sustainable European participation in current and future UN peace operations in the face of ongoing geopolitical shifts and national political pressures, and better understand the impact of European participation on the effectiveness of UN peacekeeping operations.
The International Peace Institute (IPI) is pleased to announce the Honorable Kevin Rudd has been elected unanimously by IPI’s board of directors as the board’s next chair, effective June 01, 2018. Mr. Rudd was Vice Chair of IPI’s board since June 2014.
Mr. Rudd succeeds Professor Michael Doyle, Director of the Columbia Global Policy Initiative at Columbia University, who has served as interim Chair since May 2016. Dr. Doyle was Vice President of IPI (then IPA) from 1993-1996 and has been on IPI’s board since 1997.
IPI President Terje Rød-Larsen issued the following statement:
“On behalf of the staff of the Institute, I would like to thank Professor Michael Doyle for his outstanding work in various capacities at IPI, where he has served for over 20 years. Michael has consistently shown extraordinary loyalty and dedication through his valuable contributions to IPI. He has skillfully mentored numerous young researchers over the years, who now serve important positions in international organizations, governments, academics, and non-governmental organizations across the globe. I would like use this opportunity to thank my friend Michael for the exceptional work he has done for IPI and the good of the global community we are serving.
The Honorable Kevin Rudd has served with extraordinary skills and dedication as the Vice Chair of the board of directors of IPI since 2014, and has lent invaluable support to the Chair of the board and the President and CEO. Through his chairmanship of IPI’s Independent Commission on Multilateralism (ICM), he was a skillful helmsman who, together with his fellow members and IPI staff, produced a series of reports which gave new perspectives to the challenges of the future of the multilateral system, and guidelines and advice on how to address the dangers and opportunities alike. I would like to warmly welcome Kevin as our new Chairman. And I am looking very much forward to working closely with him in pursuing IPI’s objectives of peace and reconciliation through policy research, advice, and our convening and outreach capacity.”
Mr. Rudd served as Australia’s 26th Prime Minister from 2007 to 2010, then as Foreign Minister from 2010 to 2012, before returning to the Prime Ministership in 2013. As Prime Minister, Mr. Rudd led Australia’s response during the Global Financial Crisis. Australia’s fiscal response to the crisis was reviewed by the IMF as the most effective stimulus strategy of all member states. Australia was the only major advanced economy not to go into recession. Mr. Rudd is also internationally recognized as one of the founders of the G20 which drove the global response to the crisis, and which in 2009 helped prevent the crisis from spiraling into a second global depression.
As Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Mr. Rudd was active in global and regional foreign policy leadership. He was a driving force in expanding the East Asia Summit to include both the US and Russia in 2010. He also initiated the concept of transforming the EAS into a wider Asia Pacific Community to help manage deep-routed tensions in Asia by building over time the institutions and culture of common security in Asia. On climate change, Mr. Rudd ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2007 and legislated in 2008 for a 20% mandatory renewable energy target for Australia. Mr. Rudd drove Australia’s successful bid for its non-permanent seat on the United Nation’s Security Council and the near doubling of Australia’s foreign aid budget.
Mr. Rudd joined the Asia Society Policy Institute as its inaugural President in January 2015.
Mr. Rudd remains engaged in a range of international challenges including global economic management, the rise of China, climate change and sustainable development. In 2015-16, Mr. Rudd led a review of the UN system as chair of the Independent Commission on Multilateralism. In February 2014, Mr. Rudd was named a Senior Fellow with Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, where he completed a major policy paper, U.S.-China 21: The Future of U.S.-China Relations Under Xi Jinping. He is Chair of Sanitation and Water for All, a Distinguished Fellow at Chatham House in London, a Distinguished Statesman with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, and a Distinguished Fellow at the Paulson Institute in Chicago. Mr. Rudd is a member of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty Organization’s Group of Eminent Persons. He serves on the International Advisory Board of the Schwarzman Scholars program at Tsinghua University, and is an Honorary Professor at Peking University. Mr. Rudd is proficient in Mandarin Chinese. He also remains actively engaged in indigenous reconciliation.
The International Peace Institute is an independent, international not-for-profit think tank dedicated to managing risk and building resilience to promote peace, security, and sustainable development. To achieve its purpose, IPI employs a mix of policy research, strategic analysis, publishing, and convening. With staff from more than twenty countries and a broad range of academic fields, IPI has offices across from United Nations headquarters in New York and offices in Vienna and Manama. IPI’s research covers aspects of peace, cooperation, and multilateralism including UN reform, peace operations, sustaining peace and prevention, peace and health, humanitarian affairs, WPS (women, peace and security), and the intersection of the Sustainable Development Goals and peace. IPI also produces the analysis website The Global Observatory.
Speakers from academia, politics, civil society in Greece, as well as researchers from the most prominent centers of political analysis in Europe, will come to discuss with active and participating citizens about the problems faced by contemporary democracies in Europe and on the possibilities of activating citizens and revitalizing direct democracy.