Les allégations de détournement de 4,3 millions d'euros ont suscité un vif débat au Parlement
The post Fonds d’extrême droite : une plainte à l’Office européen de lutte antifraude met le Parlement sous pression appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Stéphane Séjourné explique à Euractiv qu'il existe un risque de blocage massif à un moment où l'UE a besoin de s'intégrer
The post INTERVIEW : Séjourné vise un grand compromis politique pour sortir de l’impasse du marché unique appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Également dans l'édition de mardi : le vote du budget, de l'engrais, le web grec, l'AI Act
The post Qui a tué la directive ? appeared first on Euractiv FR.
La future stratégie de l'UE portera également sur le « déploiement à grande échelle d'aéronefs sans pilote » et les questions de sécurité
The post La Commission cherche à protéger les compagnies aériennes et les constructeurs contre la « concurrence déloyale » appeared first on Euractiv FR.
La crise actuelle est d'autant plus grave que la réaction du gouvernement est timide. Que se passe-t-il ?
The post L’Europe s’essouffle appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Les revendications du parti d'extrême droite Vox en font un partenaire de coalition délicat pour le Parti populaire (centre-droit)
The post La clause de « priorité nationale » agite la droite espagnole appeared first on Euractiv FR.
« Nous sommes l'un des marchés les plus ouverts au monde », a souligné un porte-parole de la Commission européenne. « Nous attendons donc que cette ouverture soit réciproque. »
The post Bruxelles réclame de la « réciprocité » après les critiques de Pékin concernant le label « Made in Europe » appeared first on Euractiv FR.
« Six pays ne décident pas de ce que les 27 doivent faire », déclare Luc Frieden à Euractiv
The post INTERVIEW : Le Premier ministre luxembourgeois tacle l’initiative franco-allemande visant à renforcer l’autorité de régulation financière de l’UE appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Le chancelier Merz a proposé de lever les sanctions contre l'Iran en échange de la reprise du trafic maritime dans le détroit d'Ormuz
The post Il est « trop tôt » pour lever les sanctions contre l’Iran : von der Leyen rembarre Merz appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Le Comité économique et social européen a nié mener une « chasse aux sorcières » visant à démasquer les lanceurs d'alerte
The post EXCLUSIF : Un organe de l’UE ébranlé par des allégations de corruption appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Les nouveaux accords conclus par Kiev avec les pays du Golfe ne portent pas sur la vente d'armes, mais sur l'exportation d'un écosystème de défense éprouvé sur le terrain, que l'Europe observe de près
The post Ce que les pays du Golfe cherchent à apprendre du savoir-faire de guerre ukrainien appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Il y a « un appétit pour la dette européenne », a-t-il affirmé
The post Macron ravive le débat sur l’étalement de la dette Covid de l’UE appeared first on Euractiv FR.
Credit: Phil Nijhuis/ANP via AFP
By Andrew Firmin
LONDON, Apr 27 2026 (IPS)
Yasmin Ullah, from Myanmar’s persecuted Rohingya minority, is determined to see justice. On 13 April, she filed a complaint alleging genocide against Myanmar’s president, Min Aung Hlaing, to Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office. Min Aung Hlaing led the 2021 coup that ousted a democratically elected government and this month was named president following a sham election held amid intense repression, rubber stamping the army’s continuing grip on power. However secure he appears in his position, Yasmin Ullah’s legal action offers hope his impunity may not be guaranteed.
The complaint accuses Min Aung Hlaing of genocide against Rohingya people, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group denied citizenship despite being long established in Myanmar. He’s accused of being responsible for the burning of Rohingya villages, forced evictions, killings and mass rape in a 2017 military operation, during which around 24,000 Rohingya people were killed and over 700,000 forced to flee. The UN’s fact-finding mission and its Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar have extensively documented atrocities. Civil society has played a key role in gathering testimonies from survivors and preserving evidence.
The case was made possible by changes to Indonesia’s criminal code that came into effect in January. While civil society has raised concerns about revisions to other parts of the code that restrict Indonesian people’s ability to speak out and protest, this particular change stands out as a positive development, enabling people to bring charges against alleged perpetrators of atrocities in other countries under the principle of universal jurisdiction.
Universal jurisdiction on the rise
Universal jurisdiction applies to crimes under international law, such as genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, on the grounds that these crimes are an offence against humanity as a whole and as such aren’t bound by borders.
Some states, including France and Germany, have passed laws to enable universal jurisdiction prosecutions. Many powerful states however still refuse to recognise the principle, citing national sovereignty, the long-established doctrine of immunity for heads of state and the potential for prosecutions to be politically motivated.
Yet the question of whether government leaders should be immune from prosecution has increasingly been contested. Immunity wasn’t granted when leaders of Sierra Leone and former Yugoslavia were prosecuted for crimes committed during civil wars, and the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC), removed the principle of immunity where it has jurisdiction. Ironically, the Trump administration, which resists international accountability over its officials, may have contributed to further eroding the doctrine of immunity by abducting Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro and placing him on trial for drug trafficking.
Universal jurisdiction cases have increased since the end of the Cold War. Belgium, Finland and Germany convicted people for their role in the Rwanda genocide. Switzerland secured the first guilty verdict for crimes committed in the Liberian civil war, while France convicted another Liberian war criminal in 2022. Germany convicted a Bosnian paramilitary soldier of genocide and, in 2021 and 2022, found two Syrian officials guilty of atrocity crimes.
Hopes of justice
Rohingya people have no hope of justice in a country that refuses even to recognise them as citizens, so diaspora civil society organisations are seeking it wherever they find opportunities. In 2025, an Argentinian court issued arrest warrants against Min Aung Hlaing and other senior Myanmar officials on crimes against humanity and genocide charges, in a case brought by a Rohingya organisation. Earlier this year, a human rights organisation filed a criminal case against the Myanmar regime in Timor-Leste. When authorities appointed a senior prosecutor to examine the case, Myanmar retaliated by expelling Timor-Leste’s ambassador.
These efforts complement proceedings in international courts. In 2024, the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Min Aung Hlaing for crimes against humanity, while in January, hearings began at the International Court of Justice in a case brought by the Gambian government accusing Myanmar of breaching the Genocide Convention. It isn’t a question of choosing between national jurisdictions and international courts, but rather of taking every avenue available to demand justice.
Universal jurisdiction has its limits. Those accused tend to be safe when they hold power; when states have successfully prosecuted perpetrators, it’s after they’ve lost the power that enabled their crimes. Currently, this means attempts to hold Israel’s leaders accountable for the genocide in Gaza, such as arrest warrants a Turkish court issued against 37 officials, only have symbolic value. Cases motivated by political point-scoring also risk discrediting the principle, as when a body created by Malaysia’s former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad found an array of US officials guilty in absentia, without legal basis or consequence.
Actions under universal jurisdiction, when targeted at evident offenders, can nonetheless help build moral pressure and signal that justice may eventually come. At a time when the brutal and illegitimate Myanmar regime is buttressed by China, India and Russia, and with the USA easing its pressure in pursuit of economic benefits, it matters that other countries keep holding the line, isolating the junta and exposing its atrocities.
It matters all the more when pressure comes from Southeast Asian countries, depriving the Myanmar regime of the excuse that human rights accountability is a western imposition. Two members of the Association of Southeast Asian nations, Indonesia and Timor-Leste, have now taken action against a fellow member. But other attempts in the region have faltered. Philippine authorities declined to proceed when five survivors of atrocities filed a case in 2023, while an investigation civil society filed with Indonesia’s national human rights commission that same year, alleging that Indonesian companies were supplying military equipment to Myanmar, has so far seen no progress.
As 2026 president of the UN Human Rights Council, Indonesia is uniquely placed to take the lead in the pursuit of justice for atrocity crimes. Indonesian authorities must treat this case as a priority and give it the attention and resources it needs.
Andrew Firmin is CIVICUS Editor-in-Chief, co-director and writer for CIVICUS Lens and co-author of the State of Civil Society Report.
For interviews or more information, please contact research@civicus.org
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Les fraudeurs abusent de la confiance des gens à grande échelle, et les personnes âgées en Europe constituent leurs cibles privilégiées
The post INTERVIEW : Arrêtez de stigmatiser les victimes âgées d’escroqueries à l’IA, demande un responsable d’Interpol appeared first on Euractiv FR.