Biztonságpolitika

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

The next meeting of the Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE) is scheduled to take place on Monday, 22 June 2026, 15.00 - 18.30 and Tuesday, 23 June 2026, 9.00 - 12.30 and 14.30 - 18.30 in Brussels (room SPINELLI 1G3).

Further information about the SEDE meetings can be found here.
_______________________
SEDE missions 2026:

• Canada - 26-28 May 2026
• Taiwan - 30 March - 2 April 2026
• Poland and Czechia - 16-18 February 2026
• Ukraine - 5-6 February 2026

SEDE missions 2025:

• Djibouti - 27-29 October 2025
  
• Greenland - 15-19 September 2025
  
• Norway - 27-30 May 2025
• Moldova and Ukraine - 14-17 April 2025
  
• Bosnia and Herzegovina - 24-27 February 2025
• Israel and Palestine - 5-8 February 2025

SEDE missions 2024:

• United Kingdom - 28-30 October 2024
• Ukraine - 25-26 October 2024

SEDE Committee meetings' calendar 2026
SEDE Committee meetings' calendar 2025
EP calendar 2026
Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

At its meeting on 23 June, the Joint SEDE–TRAN Committee will vote on the draft report concerning the proposed Regulation on Military Mobility. The draft report contains several amendments aimed at facilitating the transport of military equipment, goods, and personnel, while minimising and mitigating the impact of such movements on civilian transport.
Agenda - Joint committee procedure (Rule 59)
Webstreaming - EP Multimedia Centre
Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union
Committee draft report
Legislative Proposal: Regulation on establishing a framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union
Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP

 

Introduction: Warfare, Complexity, and the Expanding Environmental Dimension

Over the past four decades, security policy has undergone a profound transformation. What once centered primarily on kinetic military capabilities and traditional geopolitical rivalries has evolved into a multidimensional field shaped by technological innovation, global interdependence, and increasingly complex threat environments. Modern conflicts no longer unfold solely on conventional battlefields; they extend into cyberspace, critical infrastructure, supply chains, and the natural environment itself. As security challenges have diversified, so too has the need to understand the broader systemic consequences of military activity.
Within this expanding landscape, the environmental dimension of warfare has emerged as one of the most overlooked yet consequential aspects of contemporary security. While the immediate destruction caused by kinetic operations remains visible and devastating, the ecological footprint of modern warfare now extends far beyond explosions, troop movements, and territorial occupation. Advanced weapons systems rely on resource-intensive production processes, cyber operations can trigger cascading environmental failures, and post-conflict regions often face long-term ecological instability that undermines recovery and resilience.
Recognizing these dynamics is essential for any comprehensive analysis of modern security. Environmental degradation is not merely a byproduct of war; it is a strategic factor that shapes human security, economic stability, and geopolitical outcomes. As conflicts become more technologically sophisticated and globally interconnected, their environmental consequences grow more complex, more persistent, and more deeply embedded in the fabric of affected societies.
This publication examines the full spectrum of warfare’s environmental impacts—from immediate kinetic destruction to the hidden ecological costs of technological warfare and the long-term instability that follows in the wake of conflict. By integrating these dimensions, it seeks to highlight why environmental resilience must become a central pillar of contemporary security policy and military planning.

Transition to the Main Analysis

As the scope of security policy continues to expand, understanding the environmental implications of modern warfare becomes not only relevant but indispensable. The intersection between military activity and ecological stability is no longer a peripheral concern—it is a central component of contemporary security dynamics. The environmental footprint of conflict influences human health, economic recovery, resource availability, and long-term regional resilience. Yet despite its strategic significance, this dimension often remains underexamined in both academic discourse and policy planning.
To address this gap, the following analysis explores the environmental consequences of warfare across three interconnected layers. First, it examines the direct and immediate impacts of kinetic operations, where physical destruction and contamination shape the ecological landscape of conflict zones. Second, it investigates the hidden environmental costs embedded in technologically advanced forms of warfare, from resource-intensive production processes to the cascading ecological effects of cyber and electromagnetic operations. Finally, it considers the long-term instability that persists after hostilities end, revealing how environmental degradation can hinder reconstruction, exacerbate human insecurity, and perpetuate regional fragility.
By integrating these perspectives, the analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of how modern warfare reshapes the environment—and why environmental resilience must become a core element of future security strategies. What follows is an in depth exploration of these dynamics, tracing the full spectrum of ecological pressures generated by contemporary conflict.

Main Analysis: The Environmental Footprint of Modern Warfare

1. Direct Environmental Impacts of Kinetic Warfare

Conventional military operations remain a major source of acute environmental degradation. Explosive munitions contaminate soil with heavy metals and chemical residues, while the destruction of industrial facilities, fuel depots, and critical infrastructure releases hazardous substances into air and water systems. Forests and agricultural lands are often devastated, leading to habitat loss, reduced biodiversity, and long-term soil erosion. These effects are not confined to the duration of hostilities; unexploded ordnance and landmines can render large areas unusable for decades, preventing ecological recovery and safe human resettlement.

2. Hidden Ecological Costs of Technological Warfare

The shift toward high-tech military capabilities introduces new, often overlooked environmental pressures. The production of drones, precision-guided munitions, and advanced sensors depends heavily on rare earth elements, whose extraction is associated with severe ecological damage, including toxic waste and water contamination. Cyber operations, though seemingly intangible, can trigger physical consequences: attacks on power grids, water treatment facilities, or industrial control systems may lead to uncontrolled pollution events or prolonged service disruptions. Electromagnetic warfare can interfere with communication networks and energy systems, indirectly affecting environmental monitoring and emergency response mechanisms.

3. Long-Term Ecological Instability in Post-Conflict Regions

Beyond the immediate and technological impacts, modern warfare generates structural environmental instability that persists long after ceasefires. Displacement of populations places immense pressure on urban ecosystems, often overwhelming waste management, water supply, and energy systems. In conflict zones, environmental governance collapses, allowing illegal logging, unregulated mining, and uncontrolled waste dumping to flourish. Military bases and supply chains leave behind significant ecological footprints, including soil contamination, disrupted water flows, and long-term land degradation. These cumulative effects hinder sustainable reconstruction and increase vulnerability to future environmental crises.

Case Studies: Environmental Impacts Across Contemporary Conflict Zones

Case Study 1: The Russo‑Ukrainian War (2014–2024)

The conflict in Ukraine illustrates how modern warfare generates both immediate and systemic environmental damage. Kinetic strikes on industrial facilities, fuel depots, and chemical plants have released hazardous substances into soil and waterways. The destruction of the Kakhovka Dam in 2023 triggered widespread flooding, soil erosion, and long-term ecological disruption across the Dnipro basin. Drone warfare and electronic attacks have increased demand for rare earth elements, intensifying global extraction pressures far beyond the battlefield.

One of the most alarming ecological consequences has been the mass mortality of Black Sea dolphins. Marine biologists documented thousands of dead dolphins washing ashore in Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, and Turkey. The primary causes include acoustic trauma from naval sonar systems, underwater explosions, and the disruption of migratory and feeding patterns due to intensified military activity. The collapse of fish stocks in the northern Black Sea—driven by pollution, noise, and naval operations—further contributed to starvation and ecological stress. This phenomenon highlights how modern warfare affects not only terrestrial ecosystems but also marine biodiversity, with cascading consequences for regional ecological stability.

Case Study 2: The Syrian Civil War (2011–present)

Syria demonstrates how prolonged conflict erodes environmental governance. Years of fighting have devastated agricultural regions, accelerated deforestation, and contaminated water systems. The collapse of regulatory institutions enabled uncontrolled waste dumping, informal oil refining, and unregulated resource extraction. These activities have produced toxic emissions and soil degradation that will hinder recovery for decades.

Case Study 3: The Nagorno‑Karabakh Conflicts (1991–2023)

The recurring conflicts in Nagorno‑Karabakh highlight the long-term ecological consequences of militarized landscapes. Landmines and unexploded ordnance have rendered large areas inaccessible, preventing agricultural use and ecological restoration. Forest fires triggered by shelling have destroyed biodiversity-rich habitats. Soil contamination and disrupted water flows demonstrate how even short, high-intensity conflicts can produce enduring environmental instability.

Case Study 4: The Gulf War (1990–1991)
The Gulf War remains one of the most striking examples of deliberate environmental destruction. Retreating Iraqi forces set fire to more than 600 Kuwaiti oil wells, releasing millions of barrels of crude oil into the desert and the Persian Gulf. The resulting smoke plumes darkened regional skies for months, causing severe air pollution, acid rain, and long-term soil sterilization. Marine ecosystems suffered extensive contamination, and respiratory illnesses increased sharply among local populations. The Gulf War demonstrated how environmental devastation can be weaponized as part of military strategy.
Case Study 5: The Vietnam War (1955–1975)
The Vietnam War introduced the world to the concept of “ecocide.” The widespread use of herbicides such as Agent Orange destroyed millions of hectares of forest and farmland, causing irreversible biodiversity loss and long-term soil toxicity. Chemical contamination continues to affect human health and ecosystems decades later, with elevated cancer rates and birth defects documented in affected regions. This case exemplifies how environmental manipulation became a tactical instrument of warfare, with consequences that persist across generations.
Case Study 6: The Balkan Wars (1991–1999)
The wars accompanying the breakup of Yugoslavia revealed the deep interconnection between ethnic conflict, infrastructure destruction, and environmental collapse. Bombing campaigns targeted industrial zones, oil refineries, and chemical plants, releasing toxic substances into the Danube and other regional waterways. NATO air strikes on Serbia in 1999—including attacks on petrochemical facilities near Pančevo—caused severe air and soil contamination, with long-term health effects documented in surrounding communities. Deforestation and land degradation followed mass displacement, as refugees relied on wood for heating and temporary shelter. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, unexploded ordnance and landmines continue to threaten both human safety and ecological restoration efforts. The Balkan conflicts thus stand as a stark reminder that environmental damage can persist long after political borders are redrawn, shaping regional stability and public health for generations.

Policy Recommendations: Integrating Environmental Resilience into Security Strategy

1. Establish Environmental Monitoring as a Core Component of Military Planning

Armed forces should incorporate environmental impact assessments into operational planning, including real-time monitoring of air, water, and soil quality in conflict zones.

2. Strengthen International Legal Frameworks on Environmental Protection During Armed Conflict

Existing conventions require modernization to address cyber operations, critical infrastructure sabotage, and resource-intensive weapons production.

3. Promote Sustainable Defense Procurement and Resource Use

Defense industries must adopt cleaner production methods, reduce reliance on rare earth elements, and invest in recyclable materials.

4. Integrate Environmental Recovery into Post‑Conflict Reconstruction

Reconstruction programs should prioritize decontamination, reforestation, and restoration of water systems.

5. Enhance Regional Cooperation on Environmental Security

Regional organizations should establish joint monitoring mechanisms and coordinated ecological recovery initiatives.

Conclusion

Modern warfare has evolved into a complex, multidimensional phenomenon whose environmental consequences extend far beyond the battlefield. Kinetic operations inflict immediate ecological damage, technological warfare introduces hidden pressures, and long-term instability persists in post-conflict regions. Environmental resilience must become a central pillar of military planning, defense procurement, and post-conflict recovery. Only by addressing the full spectrum of warfare’s ecological footprint can states build sustainable security architectures capable of withstanding twenty-first-century challenges.

References (APA Style)
Balsari, S., Dresser, C., & Leaning, J. (2020). Environmental health in conflict and post-conflict settings. The Lancet, 395(10222), 1647–1657.
Belcher, O., Bigger, P., Neimark, B., & Kennelly, C. (2020). Hidden carbon costs of the “everywhere war”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(3), 506–521.
Darbyshire, E., & Weir, D. (2023). Environmental dimensions during and after the Nagorno Karabakh conflict of 2020. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19(2), 360–365.
Grimes, E. S., Kneer, M. L., & Berkowitz, J. F. (2024). Military activity and wetland dependent wildlife: A warfare ecology perspective. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 20(6), 2153–2161.
Hailemariam, et al. (2024). Managing the environmental impacts of war: What can be learned from conflict vulnerable communities? Science of The Total Environment, 927, 171974.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2022). Guidelines on the protection of the natural environment in armed conflict. ICRC Publishing.
Krampe, F. (2017). Sustainable peacebuilding and the environment. International Affairs, 93(1), 231–244.
Krampe, F., Kreutz, J., & Ide, T. (2025). Armed conflict causes long-lasting environmental harms. Environment and Security, 4(1), 3–17.
Murillo Sandoval, P. J. (2023). Disentangling the landscape during armed conflicts and post peace agreements. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19(2), 355–359.
UN Environment Programme. (2017). Environmental dimensions of armed conflict. United Nations.
Wenning, R. J., & Toma, T. D. (2023). Using US Natural Resource Damage Assessment to understand the environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management.
Zyck, S. A., & Muggah, R. (2013). Post-conflict reconstruction: Environmental challenges and opportunities. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 8(1), 74–79.

A The Environmental Footprint of Modern Warfare: A Comprehensive Analysis bejegyzés először Biztonságpolitika-én jelent meg.

Das grösste Skiresort Finnlands lockt diesen Sommer mit einer Schatzsuche Touristen an. Irgendwo in der wilden Natur wartet ein 18'000-Franken-Goldbarren darauf, gefunden zu werden. Schon in zwei Tagen teilen die Veranstalter erste Hinweise für die Schnitzeljagd mit.

Der kalifornische Gouverneur Newsom warf Präsident Trump am Montag in einem brisanten Social-Media-Beitrag vor, dass das US-Justizministerium gegen ihn ermittle. Newsom will bei den nächsten Wahlen als Präsidentschaftskandidat antreten.

Leinen los beim Schweizer Meister. In Abwesenheit mehrerer Spieler startet der FC Thun in die neue Ära. Anwesend hingegen sind Mauro Lustrinelli und Kastriot Imeri!

Kanye West ist aktuell in Basel. Der US-Rapper besuchte am exklusiven VIP-Tag gemeinsam mit Ehefrau Bianca Censori die Art Basel Unlimited. Ob er nur Kunst bestaunte oder bereits Werke kaufte, bleibt ein Geheimnis.

Grosser Knall am Montagabend in Sargans: Beim Gonzen hat sich ein Felssturz ereignet. Ein Leserreporter filmte das Ereignis live mit.

Öngyilkos merénylet Kvettában

Pakisztán legnagyobb és legszegényebb tartományában, Beludzsisztánban hosszú ideje harcolnak a pakisztáni fegyveres erők több beludzs terrorszervezettel. Ezek közül a legjelentősebb a BLA (Baloch Liberation Army), amely a terület teljes függetlenségét tűzte ki céljául és az elmúlt években sorra hajtott végre támadásokat mind civil, mind katonai célpontok ellen.

Február elején egy soha korábban nem tapasztalt terrortámadás-sorozat után a pakisztáni hadsereg már megpróbálta kisöpörni a BLA-t az ország területéről a Radd-ul-Fitna-1 hadművelet keretei között, ez azonban nem járt sikerrel. Igaz, hogy az akcióban több, mint 200 terroristát likvidáltak, több tucat civil áldozat mellett, de a szervezetet nem tudták legyőzni, az azóta is működik.

A BLA a téli harcok után május 24-én hajtotta végre az elmúlt hónapok legnagyobb terrortámadását Beludzsisztán fővárosában, Kvettában. Egy öngyilkos merénylő a város vasútállomásán hajtott bele egy személyszállító vonatba, robbanószerekkel telepakolt autójával. A támadásban legalább 30-an veszítették életüket és több, mint 50 ember került kórházba, közülük sokan súlyos sérülésekkel. Az áldozatok többsége a pakisztáni biztonsági erők tagja volt, akik a közelben állomásoztak.

Az akció időzítése nem volt véletlen, ugyanis Shehbaz Sharif pakisztáni miniszterelnök éppen másnap tárgyalt Pekingben a kínai kormánnyal és Xi Jinping kínai elnökkel. A BLA egyik célja a Kína által finanszírozott Kína-Pakisztán Gazdasági Folyosó infrastruktúrafejlesztési projekt keretein belül Beludzsisztánban épülő beruházásoknak az ellehetetlenítése. Állításuk szerint ezek csak a terület kizsákmányolását jelentik és rendszeresen hajtanak végre támadásokat ellenük.

Shehbaz Sharif miniszterelnök elítélte a támadást, amit gyáva terrorakciónak nevezett. Asif Ali Zardari pakisztáni elnök pedig megígérte, hogy le fogják győzni a terroristákat és mindenkit, aki finanszírozza őket. Régóta emlegetett pakisztáni vád, hogy a szervezet finanszírozásában India is szerepet játszik valamilyen formában, Újdelhi azonban mindig következetesen tagadta ezeket az állításokat.

Veres Máté

 

Izrael                                         

Benjamin Netanjahu miniszterelnök a hónap végén arra utasította az izraeli hadsereget, hogy emeljék meg 70%-ra a gázai övezezt feletti ellenőrzésnek a mértékét. A döntés aggodalomra add okot, mivel ez a lépés nehezíti a béketárgyalásokat.

Az Izrael és Irán közötti feszültség továbbra is fennáll és meghatározó. A tárgyalások lassan haladtak Amerika és Irán között, miközben továbbra is fennáll a térségben egy eszkaláció veszélye. A Hormuzi-szoros körüli bizonytalanság a globális energiaárakra is hatással volt.

Izrael hadiipara bejelentette, hogy új drónelhárító technológiák fejlesztését tervezik, válaszul a Hezbollah által használt pilóta nélkül vezérelt drón támadások növekvő fenyegetésére.

További fontos májusi esemény volt, hogy az Európai Unió új szankciókat fogadott el a ciszjordániai izraeli telepesekkel szemben. Az intézkedések több személyt és szervezetet is érintenek, miközben az EU a Hamász vezetőivel szembeni szankciós rendszert is bővítette. Brüsszel szerint a döntés visszaszorítja a térségben a növekvő erőszakot és megőrzi a kétállami megoldás esélyét. Izrael élesen bírálta a lépést és politikailag motiváltnak nevezte a szankciókat. A vita jól mutatja, hogy 2026 májusában tovább romlott Izrael és több európai partner viszonya a ciszjordániai telepbővítések és a palesztin területeken tapasztalható feszültségek miatt. Emellett hét ország (Franciaország, Németország, Egyesült Királyság, Olaszország, Kanada, Ausztrália és Új-Zéland) közös nyilatkozatban szólította fel az izraeli kormányt a telepek terjeszkedésének leállítására és a telepesek által elkövetett erőszak visszaszorítására.

Tekula Dóra

 

Szerkesztette: Tekula Dóra

A Közel-Kelet, 2026. május bejegyzés először Biztonságpolitika-én jelent meg.

Az Eurosatory 2024 kiállításon mutatkozott be először a nemzetközi közönségnek a Leonardo AW249 Fenice harci helikopter típusa, mely a közeljövőben az egyetlen elérhető európai gyártású harci helikopter. Most, hogy a 2026-os ILA alkalmával sor került az első dinamikus szereplésre is, igencsak megérett az idő egy bejegyzésre róla az elmaradtak pótlására.

Mockup szenzorok és függesztmények.

Az AW249 is hozza az AH-64 megjelenése óta széles körben elterjedt elrendezést. Ez alól kivétel a háromcsövű 20 milliméteres ágyú, mely az ős-harci helikopter, az AH-1 elhelyezését követi.

A jobb szárnycsonk alatt quad irányított páncéltörő rakéta indítókonténerek. Az elődtípus Mangustából a Spike ER következne, de...

 Néha felsejlik a Leonardo többfunkciós terméksorának egy-egy komponense is.

 A pilóta...

 .és az operátor kijelzői.

Első bemutató az Eurosatory 2024 alkalmával.

Ez pedig már a 2025-ös Salon du Bourget, ahol lehetséges fegyvereket is bemutattak a Fenice mellett - hangsúlyozottan referencia gyanánt: anonym cirkáló lőszer és indító konténerei; 70 mm, Akeron LP, Fulgur MANPADS alapú levegő-levegő rakéta és Brimstone.

A vörös pléjbojnyúl-kvartett rejtélye.

Zord

Annette Brun weigert sich, eine Behandlung zu bezahlen, bei der sie verletzt worden sei. Der Osteopath zerrt sie vor den Friedensrichter – und kassiert eine Niederlage.

Mexiko feiert einen Traumstart in seine Heim-WM. Dieser sorgt auch in der Grenzstadt Tijuana für Euphorieausbrüche. Blick hat das Spiel gegen Südafrika (2:0) vor Ort verfolgt.

Wer schon einmal Ferien in Italien gemacht hat, kennt das Bild: Gegen Abend füllen sich die Gassen. Familien, Paare und Freundesgruppen flanieren über die Piazza oder entlang der Promenade. Niemand scheint es eilig zu haben.

Neun der zehn beliebtesten Marken der Schweizerinnen und Schweizer stammen aus dem eigenen Land. Doch ausgerechnet ein schwedischer Hersteller hat sich aufs Podest geschlichen – und es ist nicht der gelbe Möbelriese.

Am 14. Juni stimmt die Schweiz über die SVP-Initiative ab, das hat der Bundesrat festgelegt. Ebenfalls darf sich das Volk dazu äussern, ob die Hürden für den Wechsel von der Armee zum Zivildienst erhöht werden. Die Ausgangslage ist offen.

Spokespersons for Parliament and for the political groups will hold a briefing on the 15 – 18 June plenary session, on Friday at 11.00 in Parliament’s Anna Politkovskaya press room.

Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP