A mezőgazdasági gépgyártó cég 296,39 millió forint összköltségű projektje során eszközparkjának bővítése mellett márkaépítéshez kapcsolódó marketing tanácsadás, és munkavállalói képzés valósult meg. A fejlesztéshez a hódmezővásárhelyi GÜTTLER Kft. a Széchenyi Terv Plusz program felhívásán 207,48 millió forint feltételesen vissza nem térítendő európai uniós támogatást nyert el.
A cég fő tevékenysége mezőgazdasági talajművelő gépek tervezése, GÜTTLER® márkanévvel ellátott termékek gyártása, a technológia ismertetése, értékesítése. A vállalkozás 1996-ban jött létre a német Güttler házaspár alapításával, melynek célja az volt, hogy gyártó bázisa legyen a nyugat-európai keresletnek a Güttler GmbH-n keresztül, majd saját értékesítésben a közép-európai piacoknak. Ennek folyamán először Magyarországon indult el az értékesítés.
Jelen projekt a cég termékeinek variálhatósága iránt egyre gyakrabban felmerülő igény, illetve a termékek nagyobb mennyiségben, még magasabb minőségben és kedvezőbb áron való elérhetőségének kívánalma miatt vált szükségessé.
A gépparkfejlesztés részeként beszerzett SENFENG SF4020HM 12KW fiber-lézer sík és cső vágógép egy CNC lézervágó berendezés, mely az alkatrészgyártási munkában vesz részt. Olyan alkatrészeket tudnak vele gyártani, amit eddig lassabban, pontatlanabbul, bonyolultabban vagy egyáltalán nem tudtak maguk előállítani. A LORCH Cobot Kollaboratív Robot főként kisebb és közepes sorozatok reproduktív gyors sorozatgyártására alkalmas. Rendkívül egyszerű programozhatóságának és intuitív kezelhetőségének köszönhetően egyszerűbbé vált a hegesztés, tehermentesíthetők a munkatársak, optimalizálhatók az emberi és gépi erőforrások. A kettő darab CATERPILLAR és egy HYSTER H5.5FT targonca anyagmozgató szerepet tölt be a kapacitásbővítésben. A Yaskawa ArcWorld ívhegesztő robotrendszerek segítségével pedig robotizálták a hegesztést, mely jelentősen fokozza a termelékenységet és javítja az előállított termékek minőségét.
Az eszközbeszerzés mellett a cég igénybe vett marketing tanácsadást, mely tartalmazta a GÜTTLER Kft. marketing koncepciójának kialakítását és a márkaértékesítés tevékenységeihez és folyamataihoz kapcsolódó tanácsadást. A projekt keretében továbbá egy fő munkatárs részére informatikai és digitális továbbképzés is megvalósult annak érdekében, hogy a projekt üzemeltetése és fenntartása problémamentes legyen.
A fejlesztésnek köszönhetően beszerzett új gépekkel nő a termelési kapacitás, és rövidülnek a gyártási idők. A beruházás eredményeként a cég javítani tudta technikai felkészültségét, versenyképességét és erőforrás-hatékonyságát. Mindezzel a termékek minősége javul, azok jobb egységáron értékesíthetőek, így a hozzáadott érték is emelkedik.
A Széchenyi Terv Plusz program „A mikro-, kis- és középvállalkozások modern üzleti és termelési kihívásokhoz való alkalmazkodását segítő fejlesztések támogatása” című, GINOP_PLUSZ-1.2.1-21 számú pályázati kiírásán 207 475 313 forint európai uniós támogatást elnyert, 296 393 305 forint összköltségvetésű fejlesztés 2023. november 10-én zárult.
A Széchenyi Terv Plusz program pályázati felhívásán 121,18 millió forint vissza nem térítendő európai uniós támogatás nyert el a vállalkozás. A 173,11 millió forint összköltségvetésű projektet a cég a 2022.03.29-én indított építési terület előkészítésére alkalmas eszközök megrendelésével kezdte meg, és a pályázatot a felhívásban szereplő, technológiai fejlesztést eredményező új „eszközök” beszerzésével valósítja meg.
A projekt kiemelkedően hasznos fontosságú, mert a vállalkozás a meglévő tevékenységét újabb korszerű technológiával rendelkező berendezéssel egészíti ki. A projekt keretén belül beszerezni tervezett eszközök: 1 db Bobcat E 19 minikotró, 1 db LIEBHERR L1-32 un. önszerelő toronydaru, 2 db Bobcat E27Z Forgó minikotrógép és 2 db Bobcat T590 gumihevederes kompakt rakodógép. A OMS 24 Zrt a termelési értékláncban előre lépő vállalkozás, a meglévő tevékenységét kapacitás és hatékonyság növelő eszköz beszerzésével egészíti ki.
A vállalkozás az új eszközökkel portfólióját, volumenét és a szolgáltatás hozzáadott értékét bővíti, növeli. Az üzembe állítani tervezett új eszközök hatékonysága minőségben is mérhető lesz. Ez a minőség biztosítja cégünk piacképességét, költséghatékony működését és versenyképességét is garantálja.
A Széchenyi Terv Plusz program GINOP_PLUSZ-1.2.3-21 számú, „A mikro-, kis- és középvállalkozások modern üzleti és termelési kihívásokhoz való alkalmazkodását segítő fejlesztések támogatása a leghátrányosabb helyzetű régiókban” című kiírásán 121 179 450 forint támogatást elnyert, 173 113 500 forint összköltségvetésű fejlesztés várhatóan 2024. február 27-én zárul.
Here are the abstracts from the latest issue of our Russian Media Analysis newsletter. You can also download the full text PDF version.
1. INVASION OF UKRAINE: NATO STRATEGYRussian analysts are still focusing on the issue of NATO membership for Ukraine. Many point out that the ongoing war, while leading to a de facto defense arrangement between the “collective West” and Ukraine, has also hindered it from formally joining the alliance. Many authors believe that this is a benefit to Russia, although it has come at the cost of NATO unity and an amplification of arms supplies to Ukraine.
2. INVASION OF UKRAINE: EU STRATEGYConnected to, although distinct from, the issue of Ukraine’s NATO ambitions, is the desire by its political leadership to join the EU. While Russian commentators are broadly pessimistic about how much defense cooperation there now is between Ukraine and the West, they are more optimistic that Ukraine’s EU bid will remain stalled for the foreseeable future. Although both sides have made many symbolic gestures to signal an agreement for membership down the road, concrete steps are harder to find, and the internal political machinations of the EU will further slow down integration.
3. INVASION OF UKRAINE: RESPONSES TO WESTERN SANCTIONSMore than a dozen articles offer responses to international sanctions against Russia, featuring reactions ranging from optimism to pessimism, and including skepticism and determination to wreak economic havoc on the West. Some serve to reassure the Russian public that even though foreign industries are leaving, they will still be able to access certain goods. Others discuss the prospect of more serious sanctions, such as EU bans on Russian oil and gas imports, or a U.S. sea-route trade embargo against Russia. The authors argue that such measures would introduce a number of cascading effects that would harm countries “hostile to Russia.”
4. INVASION OF UKRAINE: RESPONSES TO NATO MILITARY AIDThe details and implications of NATO and U.S. military aid and efforts to arm Ukraine are the subject of several articles. It is evident that there is concern for the unified support that Ukraine is getting from the West, but there remains a confidence in the narrative surrounding Russian capabilities against the perceived lackluster quality of provisions going to Ukraine.
5. INVASION OF UKRAINE: U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONSSeveral articles address U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s decision to cancel a Minuteman III missile test following President Putin’s announcement that Russia put its nuclear forces on a “special combat regime duty.” While some experts characterize the test cancellation as an effort to avoid nuclear escalation, one article suspects that it helped avoid drawing attention to the stagnant U.S. nuclear modernization process. An additional article takes issue with the optics and messaging that the U.S. is responsibly conducting nuclear policy, when it has conducted “mock nuclear strikes” in recent exercises and increased the frequency of nuclear-capable aircraft flights near Russia’s border.
6. INVASION OF UKRAINE: PERCEPTIONS OF A NO-FLY ZONEAs Ukraine’s request for a West-enforced no-fly zone remains unmet, Russian commentators caution against the implementation of anything remotely close to it and highlight the escalatory nature of such potential actions by NATO and the U.S..
7. INVASION OF UKRAINE: UKRAINE AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS CONSPIRACYA recent issue of the Ministry of Defense newspaper posits the conspiracy theory that “Ukraine’s scientific establishment has sufficient competencies to create a nuclear explosive device.” The content of this article appears to be drawn from a TASS report that cites the Russian intelligence agency SVR as a source of claims that Ukraine had an advanced missile and nuclear weapon program.
8. INVASION OF UKRAINE: THE BIOLABS CONSPIRACYCoverage of the conspiracy theories about U.S. DTRA reference laboratories in Ukraine continues to proliferate across Russian media sources. It now includes official newspapers as well as MOD and MFA officials. Coverage has also begun to note statements made by Chinese government officials on this issue.
9. CHINESE-RUSSIAN RELATIONSA number of articles in the Russian press assess the state of the Russian-Chinese relationship as well as China’s diplomatic and economic relations with the United States and the broader West. Many commentators are quick to point out that China is resistant to following along with the West’s sanctions regime against Russia, although also acknowledging that there remains much to be desired in terms of China’s closeness to Russia itself.
10. SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES AND NATOThe ambitions of Scandinavian countries to join NATO continue to be a worry for Russian commentators. Yet given the scale of hostilities in Ukraine, experts are quick to note that parallels with Ukraine-and any potential Russian reaction to new Scandinavian member-states-are improper. Although Russia assesses the membership of Sweden and Finland to NATO in a very negative light, it is clear that this issue is not an existential one compared to Russian perceptions of Ukraine’s or Georgia’s entrance into the alliance.
11. IRAN AND THE JCPOARussian commentators have maintained a close watch over U.S. actions and engagement with other OPEC+ and oil suppliers ever since the U.S. sanctioned Russian oil. Analysts have focused on the U.S.-Iran relationship and the relevance of Iranian oil to the JCPOA negotiations. They remain critical of U.S. moral flexibility and assert that the “special military operation” in Ukraine has had a profound impact on long-term global security, as is evidenced by the changing oil environment around the globe.
12. FOREIGN ACQUISITION OF U.S. ARMSSeveral articles focus on and are critical of the proliferation of U.S. weaponry abroad. They include the legal sale of arms to Egypt and the resulting arms capabilities of the Taliban after the U.S. exit from Afghanistan.
13. U.S. STRATEGY IN THE ASIA PACIFICAmidst the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian media maintain a close watch on U.S. policy developments in other areas of the world, especially the Indo-Pacific region.
14. INFORMATION WARFARETwo articles address alleged acts of “information warfare” against Russia, tending to take on a defensive tone about Moscow’s leadership and the progress of the “special military operation.” The first article responds to recent quotes from U.S. Department of Defense spokesman John Kirby, who noted Russia’s history of use and potential future use of chemical and biological weapons. The second article details alleged activities from the 72nd Center for Information and Psychological Operations (CIPO) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which the article claims was trained by the UK.
15. U.S. AND EUROPEAN MILITARY CAPABILITIESSeveral articles report on developments of U.S. and NATO capabilities and weapons systems. One article reports on funding cuts to the U.S. Air Force’s first hypersonic missile, the AGM-183A Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW). A second article reports on a reorganization of the 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment that puts combat groups on the first and second island chains of the Pacific at a moment’s notice. A third article reports on Germany’s decision to purchase 35 American F-35A fighter jets to replace the Tornado fighter-bombers it uses to carry American B61 nuclear weapons.
Here are the abstracts from the latest issue of our Russian Media Analysis newsletter. You can also download the full text PDF version.
1. Invasion of Ukraine: Putin’s speechIn a February 24 speech, carried in full by Krasnaya Zvezda, Russia’s president Vladimir Putin gave remarks that sought to provide background and justification to Russian actions in Ukraine. As his past speeches, this one offered an extensive overview of his grievances against the United States and the West and what he perceives as disregard for Russian interests in the post-Cold War order.
2. Invasion of Ukraine: JustificationsFive articles provide various justifications for Russia’s “special military operation” in Ukraine. Several identify defending the people of the Donbas region as the primary factor for the invasion, echoing President Putin’s justification of protecting people “who have been subjected to abuse [and] genocide by the Kiev regime for eight years.” Others argue that the main reason for the invasion is to protect Russia from the military threat posed by Ukraine’s increasing ties to NATO. Articles also claim that there are Western information operations concerning the motives of Moscow’s military actions.
3. Invasion of Ukraine: Russian Domestic PerceptionsThe views of the Russian population on the conflict are still undergoing initial polling, and divergences are expected across polling companies. One company, Russian Field, conducted a poll that Novye Izvestiya reported as being particularly supportive of the conflict. The poll was on the larger side, with 2,000 respondents across Russia.
4. Invasion of Ukraine: Discussions of Western StrategyA large number of articles discuss Russian perceptions of Western strategy towards Russia and towards the conflict in Ukraine. Articles published before the invasion focus on the role of the United States in fomenting the conflict, and highlight US weaknesses that made Vladimir Putin decide that now was a good time to push to renegotiate the post-Cold War global order. Articles published in the early days of the invasion argue that the West is in the process of realizing that it underestimated Russian power and resolve and is looking to salvage its position.
5. Invasion of Ukraine: Nuclear IssuesSeveral articles discuss nuclear issues. An article in Topwar.ru argues that the US is potentially considering the infliction of a first disarming strike against Russia. An article in Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie (NVO) discusses the possibility of Belarusian and Ukrainian nuclear weapons. In Gazeta.ru, Irina Al’shaeva writes about the “special combat duty regime” requested by Russia’s president Vladimir Putin for the Russian strategic forces. A Novye Izvestiya article points out that open source researchers have been tracking the movements of the US Boeing E-4B AWACS aircraft on the flight from Lincoln, Nebraska, after the Russian initiation of the Russian war in Ukraine.
6. Invasion of Ukraine: The Threat from NATORussian media also focused on the direct threat that NATO poses to Russia and to regional stability in Europe. The articles focused on the destabilizing effect of NATO force deployments near Russia’s border, NATO’s history of using military campaigns to achieve its geopolitical goals, and the risk of a broader conflict between Russia and NATO.
7. Invasion of Ukraine: NATO EnlargementThe potential further enlargement of NATO is both a cause and consequence of the conflict with Ukraine in the eyes of several Russian writers. Framed as a genuine threat to Russia, articles discuss the possibility of Scandinavian states joining the alliance as well as states in the Balkans such as Kosovo. Other writers reiterate the Russian line that NATO was never supposed to expand in the first place.
8. Invasion of Ukraine: Responses to NATO Military AidRussian media reflect a variation in attitudes on NATO military aid in Ukraine. Numerous commentators doubt the utility of Western assistance and dismiss it as disinformation; they say that the West is only providing older arms and materials, and criticize the selfish nature of overall Western involvement in the conflict. Other journalists express legitimate concern about the impact that such significant aid could cause in Ukraine. There is an unprecedented coordination of support, and it seems there is some surprise among journalists about the swift nature of such collaboration.
9. Invasion of Ukraine: Ukrainian EU and NATO MembershipUkrainian membership in EU and NATO is still a point of interest in the media, especially amidst an active invasion in Ukraine. Several articles posit that an acceptance of Ukraine, if it occurs at all, is in the very distant future, especially considering the presence of Russian troops. Others highlight Ukraine’s application as a forced response to Russian assistance in Donetsk and Luhansk and caution that Georgia and Moldova may be likely for EU candidate status as well. Overall, there is a shared opinion that Ukrainian membership in EU and NATO is not out of the question but has been made significantly more complex with current Russian activity in Ukraine.
10. Invasion of Ukraine: Responses to Western SanctionsNumerous articles in the Russian press discuss the recent sanctions imposed on Russia and largely dismiss the significance of their long-term impact on Russian society, stating that they are more damaging to the West. Media commentators even welcome the challenge, stating that such independence will fix issues of Russia’s import dependence and brain drain. Additionally, the Russian media analyze the challenges that the imposed sanctions will cause for specific Russian industry, such as shipbuilding and aviation capabilities and technology and computer chip development.
11. Invasion of Ukraine: Russia’s Future in the New OrderSeveral articles focus on how Russia and its role in the world will change in the aftermath of the invasion of Ukraine. These articles suggest that sanctions will cause some pain but the sacrifice will be worthwhile to achieve the goal of ending the threat posed by an anti-Russian Ukraine and restoring Russia’s greatness and sovereignty. The possibility of increasing internal repression to ensure national unity is also discussed in a positive light.
12. Invasion of Ukraine: Role of Neighboring StatesStates in the immediate vicinity of Ukraine are seen as potentially vital interlocutors in both the positive and negative sense for several Russian commentators. Poland and the wider east-central European NATO member-states are viewed as having taken a turn towards a decisive rearmament and preparation for future conflict. Meanwhile, Belarus holds its position as a key Russian ally, underlining its important role for Moscow as a constituent part of the Russian-Belarusian “Union State” and very likely a further consolidation of de facto Russian control over more elements of Belarus’ statehood and independence.
13. Invasion of Ukraine: Turkey’s PositionRussian commentators remain concerned about Turkey’s role in the Russo-Ukrainian War and the geopolitical fallout from the conflict. Perspectives vary, from those who note Turkey’s unwillingness to go along with the full spectrum of sanctions proposed by European and North American states, to others who reiterate the concern about the longer-term designs of Turkey’s leadership in the broader Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, and even Central Asian states. Observers are particularly wary of Turkey’s naval presence, which for some is described as a genuine threat to Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, alongside Turkey’s ability to block passage through the straits. The growing role of Turkey’s Bayraktar TB2 combat drones also add impetus to commentator concerns.
14. Invasion of Ukraine: The Biolabs ConspiracySeveral articles once again raise the conspiracy theory about the role of US DTRA reference labs in the former Soviet Union states, but this time in Ukraine, referencing recent coverage in the UK newspaper Expose. In an article in Sovetskaya Rossia, Valentin Kasatonov argues that “US military biolabs in Ukraine” are the reasons for Russia’s “special military operation” in Ukraine. In Topwar.ru, Yevgeniy Fedorov provides more conspiracy theories that the labs are a part of growing NATO infrastructure in Ukraine.
15. China’s Geopolitical PositionRussian commentators have noted the parallels between Russia’s ongoing intervention into Ukraine—and the West’s reaction—and China’s presumed geopolitical designs for Taiwan. Some argue that while such parallels exist, they do not necessarily mean that China intends to support Russia’s goals in Ukraine. Indeed, they argue that it is possible that this could be a major test of the strength of the Russian-Chinese relationship at the highest levels. Others are more sanguine about the relationship and argue that this provides a potential test-case for a future Chinese effort to retake Taiwan.
16. Russia-Nicaragua RelationsAlthough most commentary in Russia remains focused on events in Eurasia and Eastern Europe, some look to other parts of the world as a means of shoring up the global picture of Russia’s alliances and international relationships. An article in NVO looks to the political regime in Nicaragua. It argues that there is a friendly face in this Central American country, and that Russia can use it as “something [with which] to respond to US pressure in Europe” by further improving relations with this “soft underbelly of the United States.”
17. Information and Hybrid WarfareSeveral articles discuss how Russians understand the US/NATO approaches to information warfare and hybrid warfare. An article by Aleksandr Bartosh focuses on what he explains is a hybrid warfare in US and NATO strategies. An article in Krasnaya Zvezda focuses on the Western concept of “cognitive warfare.” In an article in Voenno-Promyshlennyi Kur’er (VPK), Sergey Korotkov argues that the “heat of information (hybrid) war [against Russia] has reached a critical point.” In another VPK article, Leontiy Shevtsov analyzes what he calls “US and NATO information warfare operations.”
18. Shortcomings of the US MilitaryOne article responds to US Navy chief of staff Michael Gilday’s recent comments that the Navy needs a fleet of more than 500 ships to meet its commitments in the forthcoming National Defense Strategy, noting that US shipbuilding capacity will be a major obstacle to reaching that goal. A second article examines the evolution of US aircraft carriers, and argues that the capabilities of current air wing configurations to counter an enemy are “significantly lower than they were” in the 1970s and 1980s. A third article examines US missile and air defense capabilities, arguing that capabilities were inefficiently developed due to US overconfidence in its pilots and aircraft.
19. US and European Military CapabilitiesThree articles discuss developments of specific US and European capabilities and systems. One article discusses the US Navy’s public launch of its Snakehead underwater drone, “which apparently is being created in analogue to the Russian Poseidon submarine platform.” A second article discusses the US Space Force’s Deep space Advanced Radar Capability (DARC) project, which “will allow the delivery of accurate strikes against enemy satellites, and will also complete the formation of a unified system for coordinating the actions of the US armed forces around the planet.” A third article discusses the “Eurodrone” project between Germany, France, Italy, and Spain.